This amount should be proven with expert testimony from a tax expert, and not through a post-trial letter from counsel to the court.

This amount should be proven with expert testimony from a tax expert, and not through a post-trial letter from counsel to the court. Justice, were both within the purview and spirit of 26 C. The value of the carry-forward is therefore the amount of tax savings it is likely to generate. Plaintiff's ex-wife, at the hearing on a motion for modification. Defendants upon such a claim, because this is his sole argument against dismissal. First let me thank Joe Baptista for forwarding this to everyone.

Nor are the fringe or the eagle of any legal significance. This is where the shorts start to get a little tight.